
by SLAMMED » 28 Nov 2009 17:18
by SLAMMED » 28 Nov 2009 17:18
Archie's penalty Oh well - that's me off the team board for a while then.
by Plymouth_Royal » 28 Nov 2009 17:18
rob the royal We'd have never lost today if we'd given sidwell an improved contract, in fact we wouldn't even be in this division. Shouldn't have sacked coppell. An we should have sacked rodgers ages ago. I only just realised all this today. Last week I thought we were going to get promoted.
by FiNeRaIn » 28 Nov 2009 17:19
winchester_royal Not the end of the world. A shame, sounds like we could, maybe should, have won.
Meanwhile, major LOLz at those calling for Rodgers' head already.
by nappa » 28 Nov 2009 17:20
Sir Rodney Effing all over.
back to normal after that silly win.
by Terminal Boardom » 28 Nov 2009 17:20
by Archie's penalty » 28 Nov 2009 17:20
by rob the royal » 28 Nov 2009 17:21
Plymouth_Royalrob the royal We'd have never lost today if we'd given sidwell an improved contract, in fact we wouldn't even be in this division. Shouldn't have sacked coppell. An we should have sacked rodgers ages ago. I only just realised all this today. Last week I thought we were going to get promoted.
I hope your joking for the sake of humanity.
by winchester_royal » 28 Nov 2009 17:21
FiNeRaInwinchester_royal Not the end of the world. A shame, sounds like we could, maybe should, have won.
Meanwhile, major LOLz at those calling for Rodgers' head already.
LOL at you for lack of footballing knowledge. Claiming we " should have won"![]()
![]()
![]()
please
by FiNeRaIn » 28 Nov 2009 17:21
Terminal Boardom My point on attendance being that a team as poor as Derby's can readily attract 30,000 plus home game after home game. In comparison, we should be 20k plus. Why can't we do this?
by winchester_royal » 28 Nov 2009 17:22
Archie's penalty One last post. People slagging off Long. Yes he was stupid to do what he did. Doesn't mean we should all turn on him.
We actually had more chances after he was sent off so I don't think it actually effected the result. HTH.
by Gordons Cumming » 28 Nov 2009 17:22
Terminal Boardom My point on attendance being that a team as poor as Derby's can readily attract 30,000 plus home game after home game. In comparison, we should be 20k plus. Why can't we do this?
by Archie's penalty » 28 Nov 2009 17:23
winchester_royalArchie's penalty One last post. People slagging off Long. Yes he was stupid to do what he did. Doesn't mean we should all turn on him.
We actually had more chances after he was sent off so I don't think it actually effected the result. HTH.
Doesn't that say an awful lot though?
by facaldaqui » 28 Nov 2009 17:23
by adamh4608 » 28 Nov 2009 17:23
by facaldaqui » 28 Nov 2009 17:25
by Sir Rodney Effing » 28 Nov 2009 17:25
nappaSir Rodney Effing all over.
back to normal after that silly win.
you pretty much sum up the majority of reading fans at the moment.....either support your team or oxf*rd off.....seriously derby can turn out 30,000
by SLAMMED » 28 Nov 2009 17:25
Terminal Boardom My point on attendance being that a team as poor as Derby's can readily attract 30,000 plus home game after home game. In comparison, we should be 20k plus. Why can't we do this?
by sandman » 28 Nov 2009 17:26
Archie's penalty One last post. People slagging off Long. Yes he was stupid to do what he did. Doesn't mean we should all turn on him.
We actually had more chances after he was sent off so I don't think it actually effected the result. HTH.
by rg6royal » 28 Nov 2009 17:27
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 414 guests