MATCHWATCH : Peterborough United (a)

143 posts

Result predictor

Poll ended at 29 Dec 2025 17:39
Peterborough win
5
29%
Draw
8
47%
Reading win
4
24%
 
Total votes: 17
Sutekh
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24041
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Over the hills and far away

Re: MATCHWATCH : Peterborough United (a)

by Sutekh » 29 Dec 2025 22:01

LUX Phew.

Table still ridiculously bunched.

Port Vale look detached, andDoncaster and Rotherham are on terrible runs. Who will be the fourth?

Yes, I am still looking behind us.


Esp. as Reading have failed to beat both at home during those runs.

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7761
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: MATCHWATCH : Peterborough United (a)

by WestYorksRoyal » 29 Dec 2025 22:06

Hound Wasn’t really following this as was out but sounds like a good/lucky point. Tbh we’ve not played great last 3 games and got 7/9

We just don’t have the players to hold the ball up and release pressure on tbe defence in these kind of games. My biggest issue with the current squad. Need a new striker or two who can do just that

That front 4 that started - seriously so so weak physically. Nothing on the bench to improve it. Have to change it

We don't have a good team really. We have an excellent GK and an excellent finisher up front, plus some old school CBs and some decent CMs who are just a bit samey and don't complement each other's strengths and weaknesses.

We're simply not capable of putting in a pressing high energy performance like Peterborough did tonight.

But LR has us performing in flashes and grinding out points. He's doing enough to earn himself a few transfer windows and show what he can really do with the right players.

User avatar
LUX
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 14283
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:38
Location: Archie Gemmill!!!

Re: MATCHWATCH : Peterborough United (a)

by LUX » 29 Dec 2025 22:12

windermereROYAL
LUX Phew.

Table still ridiculously bunched.

Port Vale look detached, and Doncaster and Rotherham are on terrible runs. Who will be the fourth?

Yes, I am still looking behind us.


We`re 10th ya big kid.



Three points from the relegation zone.

windermereROYAL
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 9085
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 11:18

Re: MATCHWATCH : Peterborough United (a)

by windermereROYAL » 29 Dec 2025 22:14

LUX
windermereROYAL
LUX Phew.

Table still ridiculously bunched.

Port Vale look detached, and Doncaster and Rotherham are on terrible runs. Who will be the fourth?

Yes, I am still looking behind us.


We`re 10th ya big kid.



Three points from the relegation zone.


And 11 places.

User avatar
LUX
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 14283
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:38
Location: Archie Gemmill!!!

Re: MATCHWATCH : Peterborough United (a)

by LUX » 29 Dec 2025 22:15

That’s, in effect, exactly what I wrote. Bunched.


MR. CYNICAL
Member
Posts: 308
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 22:33
Location: Basingstoke

Re: MATCHWATCH : Peterborough United (a)

by MR. CYNICAL » 29 Dec 2025 22:19

Obviously not many of our team have played at the hotbed of football that Peterborough is.

Orion1871
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4447
Joined: 14 Jul 2020 09:08
Location: The depths of despair

Re: MATCHWATCH : Peterborough United (a)

by Orion1871 » 29 Dec 2025 22:20

Orion1871
Referee

Alex Chilowicz


Oh ffs. It's the shit American ref who makes the English refs look like Collina.


And once again he was oxf*rd atrocious.

User avatar
morganb
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3235
Joined: 31 Jul 2017 12:30

Re: MATCHWATCH : Peterborough United (a)

by morganb » 29 Dec 2025 22:22

Extended-Phenotype Clung on there. Terrible management to think standing off and sitting deep for 50 minutes would yield anything other than conceding. Extra moronic considering how weak Peterborough looked in defence, particularly their sketchy keeper - I had him down for making more clangers in the second half, but he was rarely forced into contact with the ball.

Not sure what formation we were playing by the end, or why/where all those subs were made. Baffling stuff.


Thought the crowd put more pressure on their keeper in the first half than the players did in the second

Sutekh
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24041
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Over the hills and far away

Re: MATCHWATCH : Peterborough United (a)

by Sutekh » 29 Dec 2025 22:23

MR. CYNICAL Obviously not many of our team have played at the hotbed of football that Peterborough is.


So I presume Reading will be buying back ex-players in the January window, be dangerous to buy players who haven’t played at the SCL/Mad Stad otherwise.


Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26836
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: MATCHWATCH : Peterborough United (a)

by Hound » 29 Dec 2025 22:23

WestYorksRoyal
Hound Wasn’t really following this as was out but sounds like a good/lucky point. Tbh we’ve not played great last 3 games and got 7/9

We just don’t have the players to hold the ball up and release pressure on tbe defence in these kind of games. My biggest issue with the current squad. Need a new striker or two who can do just that

That front 4 that started - seriously so so weak physically. Nothing on the bench to improve it. Have to change it

We don't have a good team really. We have an excellent GK and an excellent finisher up front, plus some old school CBs and some decent CMs who are just a bit samey and don't complement each other's strengths and weaknesses.

We're simply not capable of putting in a pressing high energy performance like Peterborough did tonight.

But LR has us performing in flashes and grinding out points. He's doing enough to earn himself a few transfer windows and show what he can really do with the right players.


Fair summary, esp when we have a few injuries

LR has done very well to get the points he has considering the performances; not sure if it’s luck or judgement, but credit to him

I think that side tonight might be as bad a side as I’ve seen us put out in the league tbh for decades in all honesty

But yet a couple of the right signings, some of these injured players back and it might all be different

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 48263
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Peterborough United (a)

by Snowflake Royal » 29 Dec 2025 22:41

Hound
WestYorksRoyal
Hound Wasn’t really following this as was out but sounds like a good/lucky point. Tbh we’ve not played great last 3 games and got 7/9

We just don’t have the players to hold the ball up and release pressure on tbe defence in these kind of games. My biggest issue with the current squad. Need a new striker or two who can do just that

That front 4 that started - seriously so so weak physically. Nothing on the bench to improve it. Have to change it

We don't have a good team really. We have an excellent GK and an excellent finisher up front, plus some old school CBs and some decent CMs who are just a bit samey and don't complement each other's strengths and weaknesses.

We're simply not capable of putting in a pressing high energy performance like Peterborough did tonight.

But LR has us performing in flashes and grinding out points. He's doing enough to earn himself a few transfer windows and show what he can really do with the right players.


Fair summary, esp when we have a few injuries

LR has done very well to get the points he has considering the performances; not sure if it’s luck or judgement, but credit to him

I think that side tonight might be as bad a side as I’ve seen us put out in the league tbh for decades in all honesty

But yet a couple of the right signings, some of these injured players back and it might all be different

I think we've got a better team than that, but with a couple of glaring weaknesses and some really poor coaching.

There's no way we should have to go long half as much as we do. And it's often pointless because the balls are either inaccurate or to someone half the size of the defender. Wing, Savage, Lane, Ritchie, Kyerewaa, RWilliams, Marriott, Ehibhatiomhan, Dorsett, Abrefa, Yiadom etc should all be capable of passing and moving for the ball in the middle and final third, not just looking to play the killer ball or launch it to immediately score every time they get near a touch.

Multiple times today we could have controlled possession and given ourselves a breather and we just thumped it long or ran full pelt forward. It's mindless.

Tbf to him Doyle does actually try this, but he just gets shoved off the ball by a light breeze half the time

User avatar
tidus_mi2
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7974
Joined: 15 Jun 2012 15:24

Re: MATCHWATCH : Peterborough United (a)

by tidus_mi2 » 29 Dec 2025 22:52

Take the point and move on to the next one, gotta aim to beat Burton on Thursday.

MR. CYNICAL
Member
Posts: 308
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 22:33
Location: Basingstoke

Re: MATCHWATCH : Peterborough United (a)

by MR. CYNICAL » 29 Dec 2025 22:58

That's exactly been my issue with Richardson's insistence on playing the long ball game.
It's pointless if you are sitting deep as the ball will just come back every time, constantly building the pressure on the defence. Always maintain the best policy when you are winning is to try and keep possession which for some reason we are incapable of doing


MR. CYNICAL
Member
Posts: 308
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 22:33
Location: Basingstoke

Re: MATCHWATCH : Peterborough United (a)

by MR. CYNICAL » 29 Dec 2025 23:00

tidus_mi2 Take the point and move on to the next one, gotta aim to beat Burton on Thursday.

How many times have I heard that one?

User avatar
Uke
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24238
Joined: 17 Apr 2004 16:24
Location: Слава Україні! Героям слава! @UkeRFC

Re: MATCHWATCH : Peterborough United (a)

by Uke » 29 Dec 2025 23:26

WestYorksRoyal
Snowflake Royal
WestYorksRoyal I refuse to believe he's not capable at this level. He played regularly for a Steve Evans Stevenage team who finished 8th, where he would have needed to do a lot of old school CB play. He looks decent on the ball having come through the Man City academy. That he looked so bad says as much about thr state of the team at the time and I'm open minded about how he'll do this time.

That was two seasons ago, since he's been tried in the Champ and sent back to L1. And that Stevenage side was very ordinary... it was just physical, organised and had good morale.

He's painfully slow. All gangly long uncoordinated limbs and easily muscled off the ball.

He's a terrible partner for O'Connor.

How are we rating him tonight then? Burns and Pereira probably our best players.


BFTG

Agree that El Gato and Burns were our best players tonight, although Gato’s distribution was woeful the saves made up for it.

Wing was remarkably subdued, but the substitutions made no sense at all.

Where was Kelvin?

windermereROYAL
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 9085
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 11:18

Re: MATCHWATCH : Peterborough United (a)

by windermereROYAL » 30 Dec 2025 09:02

Is O`Mahony a season long loan or can we get rid next month? hasn`t worked for him here has it?

paddy20
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1255
Joined: 18 Apr 2007 17:50
Location: Wokingham

Re: MATCHWATCH : Peterborough United (a)

by paddy20 » 30 Dec 2025 09:13

morganb
Extended-Phenotype Clung on there. Terrible management to think standing off and sitting deep for 50 minutes would yield anything other than conceding. Extra moronic considering how weak Peterborough looked in defence, particularly their sketchy keeper - I had him down for making more clangers in the second half, but he was rarely forced into contact with the ball.

Not sure what formation we were playing by the end, or why/where all those subs were made. Baffling stuff.


Thought the crowd put more pressure on their keeper in the first half than the players did in the second


Totally agree. This was a game for the taking. Posh looked poor until we sat back and let them play. I think we have been lucky over last 3 games apart from first twenty at Plymouth of course helped by playing against 10 men. Hate these tactics by the new manager. We are better than this.

info@farwayhideaway
Member
Posts: 18
Joined: 06 May 2023 21:38

Re: MATCHWATCH : Peterborough United (a)

by info@farwayhideaway » 30 Dec 2025 09:21

Only saw the highlights and read the match thread. It seems to me though that for all their dominance, Peterborough really only had one or two clear cut chances. There's a different style being played by Reading under the LR but they are showing resilience, which can be worth a fair few points and few teams do well without it.

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7761
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: MATCHWATCH : Peterborough United (a)

by WestYorksRoyal » 30 Dec 2025 10:11

Busy festive period, 2 back to back away games, relatively small squad, injuries...and people are moaning about the performance.

Take a good point and move on. Sometimes it's about grinding out results and we have done that.

User avatar
Uke
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24238
Joined: 17 Apr 2004 16:24
Location: Слава Україні! Героям слава! @UkeRFC

Re: MATCHWATCH : Peterborough United (a)

by Uke » 30 Dec 2025 10:11

paddy20
morganb
Extended-Phenotype Clung on there. Terrible management to think standing off and sitting deep for 50 minutes would yield anything other than conceding. Extra moronic considering how weak Peterborough looked in defence, particularly their sketchy keeper - I had him down for making more clangers in the second half, but he was rarely forced into contact with the ball.

Not sure what formation we were playing by the end, or why/where all those subs were made. Baffling stuff.


Thought the crowd put more pressure on their keeper in the first half than the players did in the second


Totally agree. This was a game for the taking. Posh looked poor until we sat back and let them play. I think we have been lucky over last 3 games apart from first twenty at Plymouth of course helped by playing against 10 men. Hate these tactics by the new manager. We are better than this.


Really????

Peterborough pushed all game had most of the possession and we did well to hold out, especially given the ineffectual substitutions we made

https://www.sofascore.com/football/matc ... statistics

Posh win on every stat except the defensive ones!

Dorsett made 9 tackles; more than the entire Peterborough team combined (and at least 6 more than any player on the pitch)
Last edited by Uke on 30 Dec 2025 10:29, edited 1 time in total.

143 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], MartinRdg, WestYorksRoyal and 315 guests

It is currently 31 Dec 2025 13:56