LUX Phew.
Table still ridiculously bunched.
Port Vale look detached, andDoncaster and Rotherham are on terrible runs. Who will be the fourth?
Yes, I am still looking behind us.
Esp. as Reading have failed to beat both at home during those runs.
by Sutekh » 29 Dec 2025 22:01
LUX Phew.
Table still ridiculously bunched.
Port Vale look detached, andDoncaster and Rotherham are on terrible runs. Who will be the fourth?
Yes, I am still looking behind us.
by WestYorksRoyal » 29 Dec 2025 22:06
Hound Wasn’t really following this as was out but sounds like a good/lucky point. Tbh we’ve not played great last 3 games and got 7/9
We just don’t have the players to hold the ball up and release pressure on tbe defence in these kind of games. My biggest issue with the current squad. Need a new striker or two who can do just that
That front 4 that started - seriously so so weak physically. Nothing on the bench to improve it. Have to change it
by LUX » 29 Dec 2025 22:12
windermereROYALLUX Phew.
Table still ridiculously bunched.
Port Vale look detached, and Doncaster and Rotherham are on terrible runs. Who will be the fourth?
Yes, I am still looking behind us.
We`re 10th ya big kid.
by windermereROYAL » 29 Dec 2025 22:14
LUXwindermereROYALLUX Phew.
Table still ridiculously bunched.
Port Vale look detached, and Doncaster and Rotherham are on terrible runs. Who will be the fourth?
Yes, I am still looking behind us.
We`re 10th ya big kid.
Three points from the relegation zone.
by LUX » 29 Dec 2025 22:15
by MR. CYNICAL » 29 Dec 2025 22:19
by Orion1871 » 29 Dec 2025 22:20
Orion1871Referee
Alex Chilowicz
Oh ffs. It's the shit American ref who makes the English refs look like Collina.
by morganb » 29 Dec 2025 22:22
Extended-Phenotype Clung on there. Terrible management to think standing off and sitting deep for 50 minutes would yield anything other than conceding. Extra moronic considering how weak Peterborough looked in defence, particularly their sketchy keeper - I had him down for making more clangers in the second half, but he was rarely forced into contact with the ball.
Not sure what formation we were playing by the end, or why/where all those subs were made. Baffling stuff.
by Sutekh » 29 Dec 2025 22:23
MR. CYNICAL Obviously not many of our team have played at the hotbed of football that Peterborough is.
by Hound » 29 Dec 2025 22:23
WestYorksRoyalHound Wasn’t really following this as was out but sounds like a good/lucky point. Tbh we’ve not played great last 3 games and got 7/9
We just don’t have the players to hold the ball up and release pressure on tbe defence in these kind of games. My biggest issue with the current squad. Need a new striker or two who can do just that
That front 4 that started - seriously so so weak physically. Nothing on the bench to improve it. Have to change it
We don't have a good team really. We have an excellent GK and an excellent finisher up front, plus some old school CBs and some decent CMs who are just a bit samey and don't complement each other's strengths and weaknesses.
We're simply not capable of putting in a pressing high energy performance like Peterborough did tonight.
But LR has us performing in flashes and grinding out points. He's doing enough to earn himself a few transfer windows and show what he can really do with the right players.
by Snowflake Royal » 29 Dec 2025 22:41
HoundWestYorksRoyalHound Wasn’t really following this as was out but sounds like a good/lucky point. Tbh we’ve not played great last 3 games and got 7/9
We just don’t have the players to hold the ball up and release pressure on tbe defence in these kind of games. My biggest issue with the current squad. Need a new striker or two who can do just that
That front 4 that started - seriously so so weak physically. Nothing on the bench to improve it. Have to change it
We don't have a good team really. We have an excellent GK and an excellent finisher up front, plus some old school CBs and some decent CMs who are just a bit samey and don't complement each other's strengths and weaknesses.
We're simply not capable of putting in a pressing high energy performance like Peterborough did tonight.
But LR has us performing in flashes and grinding out points. He's doing enough to earn himself a few transfer windows and show what he can really do with the right players.
Fair summary, esp when we have a few injuries
LR has done very well to get the points he has considering the performances; not sure if it’s luck or judgement, but credit to him
I think that side tonight might be as bad a side as I’ve seen us put out in the league tbh for decades in all honesty
But yet a couple of the right signings, some of these injured players back and it might all be different
by tidus_mi2 » 29 Dec 2025 22:52
by MR. CYNICAL » 29 Dec 2025 22:58
by MR. CYNICAL » 29 Dec 2025 23:00
tidus_mi2 Take the point and move on to the next one, gotta aim to beat Burton on Thursday.
by Uke » 29 Dec 2025 23:26
WestYorksRoyalSnowflake RoyalWestYorksRoyal I refuse to believe he's not capable at this level. He played regularly for a Steve Evans Stevenage team who finished 8th, where he would have needed to do a lot of old school CB play. He looks decent on the ball having come through the Man City academy. That he looked so bad says as much about thr state of the team at the time and I'm open minded about how he'll do this time.
That was two seasons ago, since he's been tried in the Champ and sent back to L1. And that Stevenage side was very ordinary... it was just physical, organised and had good morale.
He's painfully slow. All gangly long uncoordinated limbs and easily muscled off the ball.
He's a terrible partner for O'Connor.
How are we rating him tonight then? Burns and Pereira probably our best players.
by windermereROYAL » 30 Dec 2025 09:02
by paddy20 » 30 Dec 2025 09:13
morganbExtended-Phenotype Clung on there. Terrible management to think standing off and sitting deep for 50 minutes would yield anything other than conceding. Extra moronic considering how weak Peterborough looked in defence, particularly their sketchy keeper - I had him down for making more clangers in the second half, but he was rarely forced into contact with the ball.
Not sure what formation we were playing by the end, or why/where all those subs were made. Baffling stuff.
Thought the crowd put more pressure on their keeper in the first half than the players did in the second
by info@farwayhideaway » 30 Dec 2025 09:21
by WestYorksRoyal » 30 Dec 2025 10:11
by Uke » 30 Dec 2025 10:11
paddy20morganbExtended-Phenotype Clung on there. Terrible management to think standing off and sitting deep for 50 minutes would yield anything other than conceding. Extra moronic considering how weak Peterborough looked in defence, particularly their sketchy keeper - I had him down for making more clangers in the second half, but he was rarely forced into contact with the ball.
Not sure what formation we were playing by the end, or why/where all those subs were made. Baffling stuff.
Thought the crowd put more pressure on their keeper in the first half than the players did in the second
Totally agree. This was a game for the taking. Posh looked poor until we sat back and let them play. I think we have been lucky over last 3 games apart from first twenty at Plymouth of course helped by playing against 10 men. Hate these tactics by the new manager. We are better than this.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], MartinRdg, WestYorksRoyal and 315 guests
