by genome » 19 Nov 2015 13:56
by Extended-Phenotype » 19 Nov 2015 13:57
CountryRoyal Steve Clarke whooooaaa
Steve Clarke whooooaaa
Fullham took the punt
They don't know he's a pcunt
In fairness when he came onboard I think most of us were all prettybut were at least grateful that Adkins was no longer taking us down. Instead we had to endure 5 months of turged footballing ineptitude as we underachieved and narrowly avoided relegation anyway. Optimism for the season at present greatened with each signing (bar Ali Al-Whoopsy) but the longer the season goes on the more chance he has to make us shit.
After losing 6-1 at Birmingham last Christmas if someone was to tell you that an uninspiring alcoholic looking Scotsman would save us from relegation, take us to Wembley, turn Blackman into a footballer, sign Matej Vydra and Ola John amongst others, get us to just outside the playoffs, then oxf*rd off to make space for a proper manager to come in.... We'd have all taken it
by genome » 19 Nov 2015 14:00
by Hoop Blah » 19 Nov 2015 14:07
genome Clarke's win percentage 36%
Adkins' win percentage 36.5%
And remember a good chunk of Adkins' games were in the Premier League
by leon » 19 Nov 2015 14:07
genome Clarke's win percentage 36%
Adkins' win percentage 36.5%
And remember a good chunk of Adkins' games were in the Premier League
by Extended-Phenotype » 19 Nov 2015 14:09
by wingnut » 19 Nov 2015 14:11
genome Clarke's win percentage 36%
Adkins' win percentage 36.5%
And remember a good chunk of Adkins' games were in the Premier League
by wingnut » 19 Nov 2015 14:12
Extended-Phenotype Both were pretty shite, though Adkins didn't have this quality to work with
I think Adkins personality causes people to be harder on him. Not to mention the fact he had McDs shoes to fill.
Clarke has certainly not been a step forward, though.
by leon » 19 Nov 2015 14:13
by Extended-Phenotype » 19 Nov 2015 14:14
wingnutExtended-Phenotype Both were pretty shite, though Adkins didn't have this quality to work with
I think Adkins personality causes people to be harder on him. Not to mention the fact he had McDs shoes to fill.
Clarke has certainly not been a step forward, though.
People were hard on Adkins because the football we played was tedious garbage.
by Extended-Phenotype » 19 Nov 2015 14:17
by Armadillo Roadkill » 19 Nov 2015 14:17
Extended-PhenotypewingnutExtended-Phenotype Both were pretty shite, though Adkins didn't have this quality to work with
I think Adkins personality causes people to be harder on him. Not to mention the fact he had McDs shoes to fill.
Clarke has certainly not been a step forward, though.
People were hard on Adkins because the football we played was tedious garbage.
...And they were harder on him because of the personality and the fact he followed McD.
Keep up
by wingnut » 19 Nov 2015 14:19
Personally speaking , I wouldn't care if Adkins had conducted all of his post-match interviews through the medium of interpretive dance, if his team played well and won matches I'd have been happy.Extended-PhenotypewingnutExtended-Phenotype Both were pretty shite, though Adkins didn't have this quality to work with
I think Adkins personality causes people to be harder on him. Not to mention the fact he had McDs shoes to fill.
Clarke has certainly not been a step forward, though.
People were hard on Adkins because the football we played was tedious garbage.
...And they were harder on him because of the personality and the fact he followed McD.
Keep up
by wingnut » 19 Nov 2015 14:20
Extended-Phenotype Tbh rather have Adkins back then race-hate endorsing Pearson.
by genome » 19 Nov 2015 14:20
wingnutgenome Clarke's win percentage 36%
Adkins' win percentage 36.5%
And remember a good chunk of Adkins' games were in the Premier League
8 out of 80 so a mere 10%. Hardly a "good chunk"
by leon » 19 Nov 2015 14:22
genomewingnutgenome Clarke's win percentage 36%
Adkins' win percentage 36.5%
And remember a good chunk of Adkins' games were in the Premier League
8 out of 80 so a mere 10%. Hardly a "good chunk"
10% of games is enough to have a significant impact on his Win % and it's still higher than Clarke's
by Extended-Phenotype » 19 Nov 2015 14:24
wingnutPersonally speaking , I wouldn't care if Adkins had conducted all of his post-match interviews through the medium of interpretive dance, if his team played well and won matches I'd have been happy.Extended-Phenotypewingnut People were hard on Adkins because the football we played was tedious garbage.
...And they were harder on him because of the personality and the fact he followed McD.
Keep up
Much as in the same way I didn't care that Clarke slurred and swayed through all of his interviews, too many games were painful to watch.
by genome » 19 Nov 2015 14:27
by Winston Smith » 19 Nov 2015 14:28
by Extended-Phenotype » 19 Nov 2015 14:29
Winston Smith Never liked him from the day the east stand mong brigade starting calling him Stevie Clarkey.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 403 guests