CONFIMRED - Glenn Murray on loan

[floyd__streete]

Agreed fee, contract signed, Palace can't back out. We just make the move official if we are happy.

With all due respect to you, how come you are party to all this very specific information

[RoyalBlue]

Agreed fee, contract signed, Palace can't back out. We just make the move official if we are happy.

What if he doesn't agree personal terms?
Are they covered in the loan agreement with Palace?

Quite. The deal could easily get hijacked by another club buying the player's loyalty if he does come good with us.

[Wycombe Royal]

Agreed fee, contract signed, Palace can't back out. We just make the move official if we are happy.

What if he doesn't agree personal terms?
Are they covered in the loan agreement with Palace?

Quite. The deal could easily get hijacked by another club buying the player's loyalty if he does come good with us.

In these types of deals it is normally a part of the loan contract that it automatically becomes a permanent deal on a certain date (the end of the loan ) unless we pull the plug. Neither Murray or Palace can do anything about it and another club can't hijack it either. I would be very surprised if it was structured any other way.

The fee has already been agreed and put in the contract and Murray will have already agreed personal terms.

[loyalroyal4life]

Let's see how he does first, could end up hoping he does not sign on a perm come Jan! Either that or a 2.5 year contract going his way!

[DOYLERSAROYALER]

If Murray bags a fair few goals and Palace are in the mire come January, I'm sure we will see a get out for Palace to retain his services...I'm sure it will suit him also as its a case of "as you were" ...in football we should accept contracts/agreements are little more than the paper they are written on..

[MouldyRoyal]

If we have a legal option, they'd have to buy us out of that, so at least they'd be giving us a bit of cash.

[DOYLERSAROYALER]

If we have a legal option, they'd have to buy us out of that, so at least they'd be giving us a bit of cash.

Unless totally watertight, a decent brief will find a loophole to negate any compensation being paid..having said that any payment would be a bonus..

[MmmMonsterMunch]

Fcuking hell who gives a fcuk!!

I am just pleased we have another striker in.

Lets hope he doesn't read this thread or the poor cnut will definitely go back to Palace in Jan!

[DOYLERSAROYALER]

Fcuking hell who gives a fcuk!!

I am just pleased we have another striker in.

Lets hope he doesn't read this thread or the poor cnut will definitely go back to Palace in Jan!

I care because Murray is a far more certain source for goals than the Russian...

[MmmMonsterMunch]

This thread has gone rapidly downhill with pages & pages of waffle about the in's & out's of this loan deal rather than people being happy about getting a striker that might actually score.......

Besides - no one actually knows anything do they?

[Old Biscuitman]

Besides - no one actually knows anything do they?[/quote]

As many a renowned philosopher will tell you, that is correct.

What that has to do with the G Murray transfer I am not sure. He will either stay after January or he will not stay, that is certain. Sorry, my Alzheimers is acting up.

[MmmMonsterMunch]

He will either stay after January or he will not stay, that is certain. Sorry, my Alzheimers is acting up.

Wise words old man, wise words

[Royal Ginger]

This thread has gone rapidly downhill with pages & pages of waffle about the in's & out's of this loan deal rather than people being happy about getting a striker that might actually score.

Sorry...uh....Glen Murray, URZ, Jester hat, goal music, #soupwatch woo etc.

['lista]

This thread has gone rapidly downhill with pages & pages of waffle about the in's & out's of this loan deal rather than people being happy about getting a striker that might actually score.......

Besides - no one actually knows anything do they?

There are no "knowns." There are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns.

There are things we do not know we don't know.

[SpaghettiHoop]

This thread has gone rapidly downhill with pages & pages of waffle about the in's & out's of this loan deal rather than people being happy about getting a striker that might actually score.......

Besides - no one actually knows anything do they?

There are no "knowns." There are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns.

There are things we do not know we don't know.

I didn't know that.

[kwik-silva]

This thread has gone rapidly downhill with pages & pages of waffle about the in's & out's of this loan deal rather than people being happy about getting a striker that might actually score.......

Besides - no one actually knows anything do they?

There are no "knowns." There are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns.

There are things we do not know we don't know.

Let's stop quoting questionable American politicians on a thread about an English footballer.

[TBM]

What if he doesn't agree personal terms?
Are they covered in the loan agreement with Palace?

Quite. The deal could easily get hijacked by another club buying the player's loyalty if he does come good with us.

In these types of deals it is normally a part of the loan contract that it automatically becomes a permanent deal on a certain date (the end of the loan ) unless we pull the plug. Neither Murray or Palace can do anything about it and another club can't hijack it either. I would be very surprised if it was structured any other way.

The fee has already been agreed and put in the contract and Murray will have already agreed personal terms.

Not so sure

“When it comes to January it will be down to the clubs and then I will make my decision on the back of that. But I can’t see why it couldn’t be permanent,” he said.

[RoyalBlue]

What if he doesn't agree personal terms?
Are they covered in the loan agreement with Palace?

Quite. The deal could easily get hijacked by another club buying the player's loyalty if he does come good with us.

In these types of deals it is normally a part of the loan contract that it automatically becomes a permanent deal on a certain date (the end of the loan ) unless we pull the plug. Neither Murray or Palace can do anything about it and another club can't hijack it either. I would be very surprised if it was structured any other way.

The fee has already been agreed and put in the contract and Murray will have already agreed personal terms.

Point taken and, if it has been structured this way (I'm not entirely sure an agent would be happy with a deal where his player is tied down but the 'signing' club can still walk away from the deal if they don't regard him as having met the criteria, particularly given what happened with Salako), all should be fine. That is, of course, unless the player decides to adopt the 'strike' tactic favoured by one of our past stars.

[Pepe the Horseman]

He's 4/1 to be our top scorer. Reckons that's good value even if he is only here till Jan.

[TBM]

Point taken and, if it has been structured this way (I'm not entirely sure an agent would be happy with a deal where his player is tied down but the 'signing' club can still walk away from the deal if they don't regard him as having met the criteria, particularly given what happened with Salako), all should be fine. That is, of course, unless the player decides to adopt the 'strike' tactic favoured by one of our past stars.

As said on bottom of previous page

Not so sure

“When it comes to January it will be down to the clubs and then I will make my decision on the back of that. But I can’t see why it couldn’t be permanent,” he said.