Pete10 We have been shit for a few years.In the past 82/83 utter rubbish .
if your idea of us being shit is top ten championship finishes then gimme more!! you have no idea what shit really is. these are still great times to support the royals!
by The Doctor » 04 Jun 2011 23:38
Pete10 We have been shit for a few years.In the past 82/83 utter rubbish .
by leon » 04 Jun 2011 23:53
by Franchise FC » 05 Jun 2011 09:28
Ark Royal Truly shit Reading teams from:
70/71 & 71/72
76/77 & 77/78
81/82 & 82/83
97/98
by Schards#2 » 05 Jun 2011 09:54
by Wimb » 05 Jun 2011 12:23
The DoctorWimb I still dispute the fact we were s**t under Rodgers, there were certainly s**t performances but as a whole the team was alright and seemed to slowly be turning the corner. So in answer to the OP I'll have to say 1998/99
so slowly that had we continued to improve at that rate we would be in a league one relegation battle.
by Jerry St Clair » 05 Jun 2011 13:11
Schards#2 I was on a corporate thing that day so was late leaving the game and saw Pardew in the car park afterwards, I was going to say to him something along the lines that "we deserve better than this" but he had an utterly haunted look on his face like a man about to top himself so I just went for "unlucky Alan".
by Ian Royal » 05 Jun 2011 13:38
WimbThe DoctorWimb I still dispute the fact we were s**t under Rodgers, there were certainly s**t performances but as a whole the team was alright and seemed to slowly be turning the corner. So in answer to the OP I'll have to say 1998/99
so slowly that had we continued to improve at that rate we would be in a league one relegation battle.
FTR (/Snowball mode on)
Rodgers final 6 games were DWLWLD = 8/18 points or 1.3 PPG.
We were on 21 points from 21 games when Rodgers was sacked.
Picking up 1.3ppg over the rest of the season would have seen us onto 53/54 points = 16th place or to put it another way, 9 points worse than the final total under Brian McDermott.
Not disputing the fact he had a poor start and floundered, but I'll maintain my stance that post QPR he did a reasonable job and the SIGNS were there that he could have dug his way out of the mess, especially if allowed to sign loan players like Griffin & Khiz etc.
Yeah his early efforts were a steaming pile of turd, QPR was an embarrassment, but it wasn't his fault Gylfi missed 3 sitters against Scunny or that Victor Mosses had a worldy/Feds had a mare against Palace.
by Wimb » 05 Jun 2011 13:51
by Tony Le Mesmer » 05 Jun 2011 13:59
by Ian Royal » 05 Jun 2011 14:00
by Wimb » 05 Jun 2011 14:11
Ian Royal I guess we just agree to differ on what might have happened.
by SouthDownsRoyal » 05 Jun 2011 19:06
Snowball Rodgers had us second-bottom, 4 points from safety having played one more game.
by Forbury Lion » 06 Jun 2011 11:56
Alan Pardew's first signing IIRC.2 world wars, 1 world cup We all secretly dream of a team of Gurneys, Kromheers, Bodins, Braysons and Scotts.
I would say we were only truly shit before we bought Matt Robinson. That for me was when it all changed and we've not been shit since.
by Franchise FC » 06 Jun 2011 20:34
Forbury LionAlan Pardew's first signing IIRC.2 world wars, 1 world cup We all secretly dream of a team of Gurneys, Kromheers, Bodins, Braysons and Scotts.
I would say we were only truly shit before we bought Matt Robinson. That for me was when it all changed and we've not been shit since.
The 3-3 draw against Stoke City was the turning point for me, Players suddenly had passion, determination and belief after a season of despair under Tommy Burns. No more giving up, This was a fight back.
Reading 0-6 Bristol Rovers was rock bottom.
by Maguire » 06 Jun 2011 20:51
by Pete10 » 06 Jun 2011 22:35
by muddyfeet » 06 Jun 2011 22:38
Pete10 ,The manager is cute.
by LUX » 06 Jun 2011 22:46
by Pete10 » 06 Jun 2011 22:49
by Pete10 » 06 Jun 2011 22:50
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 275 guests