by TBM » 14 Mar 2013 15:09
by akranes » 14 Mar 2013 15:12
by USA_Loyal_Royal » 14 Mar 2013 15:14
by Norfolk Royal » 14 Mar 2013 15:15
by Badger Finger » 14 Mar 2013 15:16
by melonhead » 14 Mar 2013 15:19
by Einstein agogo » 14 Mar 2013 15:22
by TBM » 14 Mar 2013 15:24
Einstein agogo McCarthy getting injured... what a twonk
by Royal Ginger » 14 Mar 2013 15:26
by Badger Finger » 14 Mar 2013 15:27
by ankeny » 14 Mar 2013 15:33
by Simon's Church » 14 Mar 2013 15:35
by TBM » 14 Mar 2013 15:36
ankeny Could say the players he brought in,not good enough but then it's not their fault,any first division player would not turn down the prem.So I lay the blame on Hammond and SJM,the sooner they get out the club and let Anton run it on his own the better.
by floyd__streete » 14 Mar 2013 16:10
by Elm Park Pasty » 14 Mar 2013 16:17
by Z175 » 14 Mar 2013 16:19
by Royal91 » 14 Mar 2013 16:30
by Badger Finger » 14 Mar 2013 16:33
by Maguire » 14 Mar 2013 16:40
by Mr.T10 » 14 Mar 2013 16:44
Royal91 Until we know what the budget was and McDermott's willingness to spend (in the summer) then I believe its a question that cannot be answered.
However throughout the season there were stronger starting 11's available and better tactics and team selections to be installed.
I believe these players are better than what they are showing and I think McDermott was preventing them from passing the ball.
I believe our best goal of the season was the Pog's against Chelsea, which showed a measured build up from one wing to another some short snappy passing, decent service and an excellent header. If that was encouraged I would expect us to be a lot more competitive
The biggest blame in my book rests with McDermott
One policy I think we should have adopted was the loan market. Many clubs utilise the loan market!
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 140 guests