Rumour - Nathaniel Chalobah

160 posts
User avatar
NewCorkSeth
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 9524
Joined: 05 Jul 2013 00:17
Location: Wherever Nameless may be.

Re: Rumour - Nathaniel Chalobah

by NewCorkSeth » 14 Aug 2015 09:07

CM is the position were looking most comfortable in but I don't think we can just turn away quality if its available. He's probably better than most our CMs to be fair to him..

User avatar
melonhead
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14230
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 15:36
Location: on a thorn

Re: Rumour - Nathaniel Chalobah

by melonhead » 14 Aug 2015 10:13

thought he was decent. good technique etc. but definitely better than Williams Quinn etc?
I don't think its any where near clear cut

Nameless
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8851
Joined: 23 Aug 2013 12:25

Re: Rumour - Nathaniel Chalobah

by Nameless » 14 Aug 2015 10:29

He also had nowhere near the passing ability of Norwood.

No doubt he's a very good player, but obviously you can't just keeping buying more players simply because they are available, unless you are Chelsea, Liverpool or Man Utd and money is no object if it buys success and you are happy for a player to rot in the reserves just so no I else an have them.

If you fall into the trap of just keeping on buying one more player you become like Warnock and Redknapp who may have had some success but would probably have had more if they had managed a bit more and spent a bit less.

If Chalobah comes then I hope he succeeds but I think we have enough in central midfield and one obvious major gap elsewhere. Put the couple of million a year of Chalobah would cost us into stretching ourselves for a real goal scorer.

User avatar
NewCorkSeth
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 9524
Joined: 05 Jul 2013 00:17
Location: Wherever Nameless may be.

Re: Rumour - Nathaniel Chalobah

by NewCorkSeth » 14 Aug 2015 10:41

Yes possibly but the etc includes Norwood, thsibola and kuhl who he probably I better than hence majority. I understand the argument that we should develop our own young talent who both seem very talented! But I assume Clarke is going to be under scrutiny this season and while you and I might prefer to see kuhl and thsibola get a run in the first team he probably would rather bring in a player who could slot right in at the same quality as Quinn and williams(who has only managed 30 games a season so far)

royalfan0210
New Member
Posts: 4
Joined: 14 Aug 2015 11:22

Re: Rumour - Nathaniel Chalobah

by royalfan0210 » 14 Aug 2015 11:42

How anyone can think this is not a good idea I cant understand! since the back end of last season when we had chalobah in our team we have since lost/released Guthrie, karacan, ake, taylor, apkan and obviously chalobah himself who was one of the first names on the team sheet when he was with us and the only replacement in this position we have brought in has been Quinn 5 out and 1 in coming in this position surely makes no sense as in moving forward to be competitive for all the games played in the championship season ahead. If for instance Williams was to pick up an long term injury as karacan often did this would leave us rather short with out chalobah coming back in, as I really don't see khul as being ready just yet. also if this does come off I would guess this could be the reason we have not finalised the Fernandez deal as chalobah has become an option that Clarke knows Is proven and works with our squad!!


RoyalX
Member
Posts: 270
Joined: 01 Aug 2009 19:45

Re: Rumour - Nathaniel Chalobah

by RoyalX » 14 Aug 2015 12:14

royalfan0210 How anyone can think this is not a good idea I cant understand! since the back end of last season when we had chalobah in our team we have since lost/released Guthrie, karacan, ake, taylor, apkan and obviously chalobah himself who was one of the first names on the team sheet when he was with us and the only replacement in this position we have brought in has been Quinn 5 out and 1 in coming in this position surely makes no sense as in moving forward to be competitive for all the games played in the championship season ahead. If for instance Williams was to pick up an long term injury as karacan often did this would leave us rather short with out chalobah coming back in, as I really don't see khul as being ready just yet. also if this does come off I would guess this could be the reason we have not finalised the Fernandez deal as chalobah has become an option that Clarke knows Is proven and works with our squad!!


Hi Nathaniel, welcome to the board.

User avatar
Pepe the Horseman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 18984
Joined: 23 Jun 2011 10:24
Location: Putting right what once went wrong

Re: Rumour - Nathaniel Chalobah

by Pepe the Horseman » 14 Aug 2015 12:26

royalfan0210 How anyone can think this is not a good idea I cant understand! since the back end of last season when we had chalobah in our team we have since lost/released Guthrie, karacan, ake, taylor, apkan and obviously chalobah himself who was one of the first names on the team sheet when he was with us and the only replacement in this position we have brought in has been Quinn 5 out and 1 in coming in this position surely makes no sense as in moving forward to be competitive for all the games played in the championship season ahead. If for instance Williams was to pick up an long term injury as karacan often did this would leave us rather short with out chalobah coming back in, as I really don't see khul as being ready just yet. also if this does come off I would guess this could be the reason we have not finalised the Fernandez deal as chalobah has become an option that Clarke knows Is proven and works with our squad!!

Taylor wasn't a CM. Ake was here for what, four games? And played LB for most, if not all of them. And Jem managed nine games. Neither Guthrie or Akpan were first team regulars. And we've now got Tshibola, as well as Quinn.

User avatar
WoodleyRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5956
Joined: 16 Jun 2008 10:49
Location: when was the last time you did something for the first time?

Re: Rumour - Nathaniel Chalobah

by WoodleyRoyal » 14 Aug 2015 12:29

Pepe the Horseman
royalfan0210 How anyone can think this is not a good idea I cant understand! since the back end of last season when we had chalobah in our team we have since lost/released Guthrie, karacan, ake, taylor, apkan and obviously chalobah himself who was one of the first names on the team sheet when he was with us and the only replacement in this position we have brought in has been Quinn 5 out and 1 in coming in this position surely makes no sense as in moving forward to be competitive for all the games played in the championship season ahead. If for instance Williams was to pick up an long term injury as karacan often did this would leave us rather short with out chalobah coming back in, as I really don't see khul as being ready just yet. also if this does come off I would guess this could be the reason we have not finalised the Fernandez deal as chalobah has become an option that Clarke knows Is proven and works with our squad!!

Taylor wasn't a CM. Ake was here for what, four games? And played LB for most, if not all of them. And Jem managed nine games. Neither Guthrie or Akpan were first team regulars. And we've now got Tshibola, as well as Quinn.


but apart from that he was spot on

royalfan0210
New Member
Posts: 4
Joined: 14 Aug 2015 11:22

Re: Rumour - Nathaniel Chalobah

by royalfan0210 » 14 Aug 2015 12:40

Pepe the Horseman
royalfan0210 How anyone can think this is not a good idea I cant understand! since the back end of last season when we had chalobah in our team we have since lost/released Guthrie, karacan, ake, taylor, apkan and obviously chalobah himself who was one of the first names on the team sheet when he was with us and the only replacement in this position we have brought in has been Quinn 5 out and 1 in coming in this position surely makes no sense as in moving forward to be competitive for all the games played in the championship season ahead. If for instance Williams was to pick up an long term injury as karacan often did this would leave us rather short with out chalobah coming back in, as I really don't see khul as being ready just yet. also if this does come off I would guess this could be the reason we have not finalised the Fernandez deal as chalobah has become an option that Clarke knows Is proven and works with our squad!!

Taylor wasn't a CM. Ake was here for what, four games? And played LB for most, if not all of them. And Jem managed nine games. Neither Guthrie or Akpan were first team regulars. And we've now got Tshibola, as well as Quinn.


quite OBVIOUSLY they wasn't all regular starters unless we were playing a field or cm's???? but the point being if we had injury or needed to use one of them we could... where as in our position now we wont have that luxury. if your stating that a players is pointless if not a regular starter shall we say goodbye to all players not in sundays starting 11??


Nameless
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8851
Joined: 23 Aug 2013 12:25

Re: Rumour - Nathaniel Chalobah

by Nameless » 14 Aug 2015 12:57

We've got 5 players to cover 2 positions in midfield. How much cover do you want ? Even if that isn't enough we've got other players capable of playing in midfield in emergencies.
Losing players who didn't play is kind of irrelevant
If we had brought in a striker and we're adding a luxury midfielder it may be different, but adding an expensive and essentially superfluous midfielder when we haven't sorted the goal scoring seems wrong. It's not as if Chalobah adds anything going forward.
The conclusion to draw if we sign him is Clarke is being heavily backed, because the striker is still a major requirement and will need a significant investment

User avatar
Pepe the Horseman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 18984
Joined: 23 Jun 2011 10:24
Location: Putting right what once went wrong

Re: Rumour - Nathaniel Chalobah

by Pepe the Horseman » 14 Aug 2015 13:00

Looks like the Spanish bloke is a done deal. So with Chalobah we'd have seven CMs. Seems a tad unnecessary.

Nameless
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8851
Joined: 23 Aug 2013 12:25

Re: Rumour - Nathaniel Chalobah

by Nameless » 14 Aug 2015 13:02

Pepe the Horseman Looks like the Spanish bloke is a done deal. So with Chalobah we'd have seven CMs. Seems a tad unnecessary.


What if they all got in the same people carrier on the way back from training and it crashed ?
We'd be left with no midfielders, we need at least 3 more just in case....

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: Rumour - Nathaniel Chalobah

by Hoop Blah » 14 Aug 2015 13:06

Pepe the Horseman Looks like the Spanish bloke is a done deal. So with Chalobah we'd have seven CMs. Seems a tad unnecessary.


It looks a bit like Clarke is building a squad capable of playing a system with 3 central midfielders so it might not be that unnecessary, especially as Kuhl may still be allowed out on loan and Norwood wasn't a trusted option for most of Clarkes spell last season.


User avatar
paultheroyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12837
Joined: 04 Mar 2005 12:59
Location: Hob Nob Reality TV Champ 2010/2011

Re: Rumour - Nathaniel Chalobah

by paultheroyal » 14 Aug 2015 13:26

Give it 4 weeks and Charles will be writing a story on the "hard done by" player Norwood.

Might have a point but Mr Watts is very predictable!

User avatar
TBM
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 16899
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:27
Location: Prediction League Champion 2009/2010, 2010/2011 & 2013/2014

Re: Rumour - Nathaniel Chalobah

by TBM » 14 Aug 2015 13:43

Hoop Blah
Pepe the Horseman Looks like the Spanish bloke is a done deal. So with Chalobah we'd have seven CMs. Seems a tad unnecessary.


It looks a bit like Clarke is building a squad capable of playing a system with 3 central midfielders so it might not be that unnecessary, especially as Kuhl may still be allowed out on loan and Norwood wasn't a trusted option for most of Clarkes spell last season.


Plus Chalobah can play at the back or at full back if need be

Royalwaster
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3719
Joined: 13 Jul 2004 13:32

Re: Rumour - Nathaniel Chalobah

by Royalwaster » 14 Aug 2015 14:19

royalfan0210 How anyone can think this is not a good idea I cant understand! since the back end of last season when we had chalobah in our team we have since lost/released Guthrie, karacan, ake, taylor, apkan and obviously chalobah himself who was one of the first names on the team sheet when he was with us and the only replacement in this position we have brought in has been Quinn 5 out and 1 in coming in this position surely makes no sense as in moving forward to be competitive for all the games played in the championship season ahead. If for instance Williams was to pick up an long term injury as karacan often did this would leave us rather short with out chalobah coming back in, as I really don't see khul as being ready just yet. also if this does come off I would guess this could be the reason we have not finalised the Fernandez deal as chalobah has become an option that Clarke knows Is proven and works with our squad!!


Dave?

3points
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2452
Joined: 27 Oct 2013 17:22

Re: Rumour - Nathaniel Chalobah

by 3points » 14 Aug 2015 21:36

Royalwaster
royalfan0210 How anyone can think this is not a good idea I cant understand! since the back end of last season when we had chalobah in our team we have since lost/released Guthrie, karacan, ake, taylor, apkan and obviously chalobah himself who was one of the first names on the team sheet when he was with us and the only replacement in this position we have brought in has been Quinn 5 out and 1 in coming in this position surely makes no sense as in moving forward to be competitive for all the games played in the championship season ahead. If for instance Williams was to pick up an long term injury as karacan often did this would leave us rather short with out chalobah coming back in, as I really don't see khul as being ready just yet. also if this does come off I would guess this could be the reason we have not finalised the Fernandez deal as chalobah has become an option that Clarke knows Is proven and works with our squad!!


Dave?

Far too coherent and logical for Dave

3points
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2452
Joined: 27 Oct 2013 17:22

Re: Rumour - Nathaniel Chalobah

by 3points » 14 Aug 2015 21:39

Hoop Blah
Pepe the Horseman Looks like the Spanish bloke is a done deal. So with Chalobah we'd have seven CMs. Seems a tad unnecessary.


It looks a bit like Clarke is building a squad capable of playing a system with 3 central midfielders so it might not be that unnecessary, especially as Kuhl may still be allowed out on loan and Norwood wasn't a trusted option for most of Clarkes spell last season.

agree on the 3 central midfielders. Think this was his preferred formation at WBA. Expect to see GMac and Paulo playing as a 2 behind a lone striker, then dropping in when defending 4-3-2-1 Christmas tree formation

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Rumour - Nathaniel Chalobah

by Ian Royal » 15 Aug 2015 11:22

Chalobah is just another Quinn / Williams / Tshibola. If we do get a midfielder we want something different. Not a hard working box to box or defensive player. But someone with a creative passing range or the ability to score goals.

There's no point in getting a loanee like Chalobah whose about as good as Williams or Quinn because he either replaces them for one year - short-termism. Or sits on the bench covering them - waste of time for Chelsea, waste of money for us and blocks long term progress for Tish.

Even if we play 3 in midfield a succesful combination isn't going to be him, Williams and Quinn it's just too stodgy.

Lacoste

Re: Rumour - Nathaniel Chalobah

by Lacoste » 15 Aug 2015 11:24

Clarke looked like he had a strategy early in the summer, now he looks gung ho.

The poor man is clueless. New boss by October.

160 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests

It is currently 09 Jul 2025 23:23