by Avon Royal » 01 Sep 2010 00:25
by ZacNaloen » 01 Sep 2010 00:27
winchester_royal What I want to know...is why the bloody hell Fordham is holding out on us.
The guy is meant to be an investigative reporter, not RFC's little lap dog reporting their news if and when they're ready.
by TommyF » 01 Sep 2010 00:28
winchester_royal What I want to know...is why the bloody hell Fordham is holding out on us.
The guy is meant to be an investigative reporter, not RFC's little lap dog reporting their news if and when they're ready.
by winchester_royal » 01 Sep 2010 00:29
ZacNaloenwinchester_royal What I want to know...is why the bloody hell Fordham is holding out on us.
The guy is meant to be an investigative reporter, not RFC's little lap dog reporting their news if and when they're ready.
if he breaks there confidence he'll never get an exclusive again!
by winchester_royal » 01 Sep 2010 00:30
TommyFwinchester_royal What I want to know...is why the bloody hell Fordham is holding out on us.
The guy is meant to be an investigative reporter, not RFC's little lap dog reporting their news if and when they're ready.
That will be because he is a reporter and therefore needs to sell papers in order to earn his wage. What's the points of a reporter 'scooping' his own newspaper by leaking all the details on Twitter. He's not a South African English cricketer you know!
by winchester_royal » 01 Sep 2010 00:37
by M-U-R-T-Y » 01 Sep 2010 00:42
by Millsy » 01 Sep 2010 00:42
by Davyc » 01 Sep 2010 00:44
M-U-R-T-Y Surely it can't be... he was available on a free, right? Which means we wouldn't have to worry about getting it ratified on deadline day.
And Fordham said no hints, wait 'til tomorrow... unless he caved.
by roadrunner » 01 Sep 2010 00:45
DavycM-U-R-T-Y Surely it can't be... he was available on a free, right? Which means we wouldn't have to worry about getting it ratified on deadline day.
And Fordham said no hints, wait 'til tomorrow... unless he caved.
technicaly it is tomrrow its past 12 now soo goood possibility it could be
by M-U-R-T-Y » 01 Sep 2010 00:47
by Davyc » 01 Sep 2010 00:48
roadrunnerDavycM-U-R-T-Y Surely it can't be... he was available on a free, right? Which means we wouldn't have to worry about getting it ratified on deadline day.
And Fordham said no hints, wait 'til tomorrow... unless he caved.
technicaly it is tomrrow its past 12 now soo goood possibility it could be
No no no, someone quoted Fordham earlier saying it was a striker.
by Elliott » 01 Sep 2010 00:50
by Scrappy » 01 Sep 2010 00:53
Elliott So if this Hendrie thing is true, then our 3 transfers in today will have an average age of about 31/32ish? Building for the future aye?
by Alan Partridge » 01 Sep 2010 00:56
by Horsham Royal » 01 Sep 2010 02:12
by West Stand Flash » 01 Sep 2010 08:02
by Big Foot » 01 Sep 2010 08:13
2 world wars, 1 world cup According to Madejski Gylfi went against our wishes so we'll be looking to pump that reluctantly acquired money straight back into the squad. Add to that the unspent money still sitting there untouched that Coppell just chose not to spend (again against Madejski's will of course) and we can guarantee it's definitely going to be a £6M+ signing to fulfill our Premiership ambitions.
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 01 Sep 2010 08:19
by Royalwaster » 01 Sep 2010 08:35
Big Foot2 world wars, 1 world cup According to Madejski Gylfi went against our wishes so we'll be looking to pump that reluctantly acquired money straight back into the squad. Add to that the unspent money still sitting there untouched that Coppell just chose not to spend (again against Madejski's will of course) and we can guarantee it's definitely going to be a £6M+ signing to fulfill our Premiership ambitions.
I know for a fact that Gylfi didn't want to leave
Users browsing this forum: Jackson Corner, tidus_mi2 and 398 guests